The concept of tax havens has probably been around since countries decided to finance their governments by taxing their citizens.
Partly, countries might compete by keeping taxes low and thus attracting business from high tax countries. Sometimes a country will designate a region or city a low tax or tax free zone, either to stimulate its economy or to buy the loyalty of its citizens.
Ancient Rome was a master in using tax free areas, a sort of early enterprise zones. The first recorded instance took place in the 2nd Century BC when Rome decided to undercut the then independent Greek island state of Rhodes by establishing a tax free port on the island of Delos. Even though Rhodes only charged a 2 percent on trade, it quickly lost trade to the new tax free port and its era as a commercial power was effectively ended.
Rome often used tax policy to reward friends and punish enemies. Cities which were loyal were often granted tax free status. Cities which were not so loyal had to pay tribute, often at the point of a sword. The ancient kingdom of Judea unwisely refused a treaty of friendship with Rome, which would have led to tax free status. Instead the Jews lost their freedom and, in the fullness of time, their country for the next 18 centuries.
The original Muslims conquerors used tax policy as a means of religious conversion. While the Muslims who conquered much of the world between modern Spain and modern Pakistan were relatively tolerant toward their follow monotheists, including Christians and Jews, they did impose a special tax on anyone who refused to convert to Islam. Naturally, quite a few people in the places where the Prophet’s warriors subdued became fervent Muslims.
The European colonial powers attracted settlers to the New World with favorable tax policies The Spanish, the English, and the Dutch dangled low taxes as an incentive for its citizens to brave a long ocean voyage and start life in a wilderness filled with often unfriendly natives. Ironically the main cause of the American Revolution stemmed from an attempt by the English government to raise taxes on the citizens of the American colonies to pay for their defense and administration.
Most economic observers propose that the 'true' original tax haven was Switzerland, with the runner-up being Liechtenstein. The banking industry in Switzerland was historically known as a capital haven, particulary for citizens running away from social disturbance in many countries, such as Germany, Russia, and South America among others.
In the early 1900's, directly after the Great War, following widespread devastation, a large number of governments in Europe raised taxes abruptly to help pay for reconstruction efforts. For the most part, Switzerland, having stayed neutral during World War I, evaded these increased costs of rebuilding infrastructure. It was, therefore, perfectly positioned to keep a low tax base. Consequently, there was a substantial stream of capital into Switzerland for tax-related reasons.
Tax haven usage in modern times has undergone several phases of development, especially after World War II. 'Tax Haven' typically referred to personal taxation avoidance, between the 1920's and the 1950's. Often times, the term was used to mean 'countries that a person could retire to and reduce their post-retirement tax burden.' After the 1950's, however, corporate entities increasingly began to use tax havens to lower their global tax obligations.
This corporate tax-reduction strategy usually depended on an existing double taxation treaty between a small jurisdiction (one with a low tax liability) and a larger jurisdiction (one with a high tax burden that the company would otherwise be subject to). To take advantage of the double taxation treaty and thereby pay taxes at the lower rate, corporations would structure company ownership through the smaller jurisdiction.
Ironically, the U.K. probably has been more responsible for the proliferation of tax havens than any other single nation, which during the late 1960's and throughout the 1970's encouraged many of its dependent territories and soon to be independent micro-nations, to develop their own financial services industries so as to make them less dependent on Whitehall for economic aid. This was, at the same time when the nation under the Labour government of the late 1960's, established an hitherto unprecedented 90% top marginal tax rate. (Something that the current French president seems only too eager to copy with a 75% top marginal rate on its 'super-rich').
The majority of tax havens, between the early and mid-1980s, shifted the aim of their legislation to develop corporate instruments that were 'hypothecated' and exempt from local taxation (in most cases, these could not trade locally either). These vehicles typically were referred to as 'exempt companies' or 'international business corporations' (IBC's).
Modern tax havens do not even have to be separate countries. The United States has seen the flight of businesses and capital from high tax, high regulation states such as California, Illinois, and New York to low tax states such as Texas and Florida. The latter states are cleverly using tax policy to build up industry, create jobs and, ironically, increase tax revenue at the expense of the former.
For more information on the most appropriate corporate vehicles in select tax havens, contact us.