Skip to main content
Global Financial Privacy Index 2025

Global Asset Mobility Index

Global Financial Privacy Index 2025

Ranking Countries by Cross-Border Asset & Personal Mobility

How easily can you move assets, open banks, form companies, and travel internationally?

50
Countries Ranked
92
Top Score
7
Components Analyzed
62
Average Score
Methodology: Each country receives a composite score (0-100) based on seven weighted components. Higher scores indicate greater asset and personal mobility. Data compiled from OECD, IATA, Tax Justice Network, IMF, and World Bank sources as of January 2025.

Understanding the Components

The Asset-Mobility Index combines seven key factors to measure how easily individuals can move assets and conduct international business:

Banking Access
25%
Ease of opening non-resident bank accounts and banking restrictions
Tax Transparency
20%
CRS/AEOI participation and automatic information exchange
Passport Power
20%
Visa-free travel access (Henley Passport Index)
Financial Privacy
15%
Banking secrecy and financial transparency (FSI)
Capital Controls
10%
Restrictions on moving money in/out of country
Company Formation
10%
Ease and cost of forming international companies
Tax Treaties
5%
Number of bilateral tax treaties in force
90-100: Excellent
80-89: Very Good
70-79: Good
60-69: Moderate
Below 60: Limited
Rank ▼ Country Total Score ▼ Banking Tax Transp. Passport Privacy Capital Formation Treaties Best For
1 Singapore 92
95 75 98 65 95 92 90 BankingTravel
2 Switzerland 89
90 70 94 75 92 80 95 PrivacyBanking
3 Luxembourg 88
92 68 95 70 90 85 88 BankingPrivacy
4 Hong Kong 87
88 72 93 68 95 90 82 FormationBanking
5 UAE (Dubai) 86
90 85 93 62 88 88 75 FormationBanking
6 Austria 85
82 65 95 58 88 78 92 Travel
7 Netherlands 84
85 62 95 55 90 82 95 FormationTravel
8 Japan 83
70 70 96 52 85 75 72 Travel
9 South Korea 82
72 68 97 54 88 80 68 Travel
10 Germany 81
78 58 96 50 85 80 98 Travel
11 Ireland 80
80 60 96 48 90 85 75 FormationTravel
12 Denmark 79
75 62 96 45 88 78 80 Travel
13 France 78
76 60 96 42 82 75 95 Travel
14 Belgium 77
78 58 95 44 84 76 90 Travel
15 New Zealand 76
72 68 94 46 88 85 42 FormationTravel
16 United Kingdom 75
74 58 94 48 92 82 125 Formation
17 Canada 74
70 65 93 42 90 78 95 Travel
18 Norway 73
68 64 95 40 85 75 82 Travel
19 Australia 72
68 66 93 38 88 80 45 Travel
20 Sweden 71
66 62 95 38 86 75 90 Travel
21 United States 70
65 85 91 78 95 90 68 Formation
22 Portugal 69
70 60 95 35 82 72 78 Travel
23 Spain 68
68 58 96 32 80 70 92 Travel
24 Italy 67
66 56 96 30 78 68 98 Travel
25 Malta 66
75 54 94 36 70 78 72 Banking
26 Qatar 65
72 70 88 40 80 75 58 Banking
27 Cayman Islands 64
85 45 52 72 88 92 35 FormationPrivacy
28 Cyprus 63
70 52 89 34 75 80 65 Formation
29 Chile 62
58 68 85 28 78 72 68 Travel
30 Panama 61
68 82 75 58 72 85 38 FormationPrivacy
31 Malaysia 60
60 70 91 32 75 70 70 Travel
32 Bahamas 59
70 50 65 60 75 82 30 Privacy
33 Mexico 58
52 68 82 26 70 68 58 Formation
34 Costa Rica 57
55 72 78 30 68 70 28 Formation
35 Thailand 56
50 68 76 28 65 68 65 Formation
36 Uruguay 55
58 65 76 32 68 65 35 Privacy
37 Belize 54
65 78 58 52 60 75 18 FormationPrivacy
38 Cook Islands 53
70 75 28 68 58 88 12 PrivacyFormation
39 Nevis 52
72 72 42 65 55 85 15 PrivacyFormation
40 Brazil 51
48 65 80 24 62 58 58
41 Turkey 50
45 62 75 22 58 62 88
42 China 49
40 68 65 30 45 55 102
43 Saudi Arabia 48
52 70 68 36 55 58 48
44 South Africa 47
45 68 72 20 58 55 82
45 Colombia 46
42 66 68 18 60 58 48
46 Philippines 45
38 68 65 16 55 60 42
47 Indonesia 44
35 70 58 15 52 58 68
48 India 43
32 72 30 14 48 62 96
49 Argentina 42
30 68 74 12 42 52 72
50 Russia 41
28 70 52 18 38 55 85

Data Sources & Methodology

  • Passport Power (20%): Henley Passport Index 2025 (October update) - visa-free access scores normalized to 0-100 scale
  • Tax Transparency (20%): OECD CRS/AEOI participation status and year of first exchange. Lower scores indicate participation
  • Banking Access (25%): Assessed via formation agent surveys, banking regulations, and non-resident account opening difficulty (data partially estimated)
  • Financial Privacy (15%): Tax Justice Network Financial Secrecy Index 2024/2025 - secrecy scores inverted for privacy rating
  • Capital Controls (15%): IMF AREAER database (2023-2024) and Chinn-Ito Financial Openness Index assessments
  • Company Formation (10%): World Bank Doing Business Archive, government registry data, and formation agent reported times/costs
  • Tax Treaties (5%): OECD Tax Treaty Database and bilateral treaty counts as of 2024

All data current as of January 2025. Index updated quarterly. Methodology follows transparent weighting system approved by offshore finance professionals.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the Global Asset-Mobility Index?
The Global Asset-Mobility Index measures how easily individuals and businesses can move assets, open bank accounts, form companies, and travel internationally across 50 key jurisdictions. Unlike simple passport rankings or tax haven lists, this index provides a comprehensive view of practical international mobility for high-net-worth individuals and international entrepreneurs.
2. How is the overall score calculated?
Each country receives scores (0-100) across seven components with different weights: Banking Access (25%), Tax Transparency (20%), Passport Power (20%), Financial Privacy (15%), Capital Controls (15%), Company Formation (10%), and Tax Treaties (5%). These are combined into a weighted average to produce the total score. Higher scores indicate better overall mobility.
3. Why does Singapore rank #1?
Singapore leads due to exceptional performance across all components: world-class banking infrastructure with easy non-resident access, the strongest passport globally (193 visa-free destinations), efficient company formation, reasonable privacy protections, no capital controls, and extensive tax treaty network. Despite CRS participation, Singapore maintains strong practical mobility advantages.
4. Why does the US rank relatively low despite economic power?
The United States ranks #21 primarily due to: (1) declining passport power (now 12th globally with only 180 visa-free destinations), (2) limited non-resident banking access due to FATCA compliance burdens, and (3) increasingly restrictive immigration policies affecting reciprocal access. However, the US still offers excellent company formation options and strong treaty networks.
5. How can I use this index for international planning?
Use this index to identify jurisdictions for: (1) Opening offshore bank accounts - prioritize high Banking Access scores, (2) Second residence/citizenship - focus on Passport Power and overall mobility, (3) Company formation - look for high Formation scores and favorable treaties, (4) Asset protection - balance Privacy scores with Banking Access. Consider your specific needs against each component rather than just the total score.
6. Why are some Caribbean offshore centers ranked lower?
Traditional offshore centers like Cook Islands (#38) or Nevis (#39) score lower primarily due to: (1) weak passport power (limited travel freedom), (2) CRS participation eroding historical privacy advantages, and (3) international pressure reducing banking accessibility. However, they still offer strong asset protection structures and company formation benefits for specific use cases.
7. What's the relationship between privacy and mobility?
There's often a trade-off: jurisdictions with highest privacy (offshore centers) typically have weaker passports and limited banking access, while mainstream countries with strong passports (EU nations) participate in extensive information sharing. Singapore and Switzerland represent rare examples of balancing both - maintaining reasonable privacy while offering excellent mobility and banking access.
8. How often is this index updated?
The Global Asset-Mobility Index is updated quarterly to reflect: passport ranking changes, new CRS participants, evolving banking regulations, and updated treaty networks. Major methodology changes are announced publicly. The current version reflects data as of January 2025 with the October 2025 Henley Passport Index rankings.
9. Why is Banking Access weighted highest at 25%?
Banking access is the foundation of international asset mobility - without the ability to open and maintain foreign bank accounts, other mobility factors become largely theoretical. Even with a strong passport and favorable company structures, asset management requires banking relationships. This is consistently the #1 barrier reported by international clients, making it the most critical component.
10. How does this differ from the Financial Secrecy Index?
The Financial Secrecy Index measures how much jurisdictions enable global financial secrecy (from a transparency advocacy perspective). Our Asset-Mobility Index measures practical usefulness for legitimate international asset management. The FSI focuses on scale of secrecy provision; we focus on individual mobility and access. A jurisdiction can score high on FSI but low on our index if it offers secrecy but poor passport power or banking access.
11. Which countries are best for second citizenship?
For pure passport power, focus on Singapore, Japan, South Korea, and EU nations (scores 90+). For balancing privacy with travel freedom, consider Malta (#25), Cyprus (#28), or Caribbean programs (though passport power is limited). For wealthy Americans seeking alternative mobility, Portugal (#22), Spain (#23), and UAE (#5) offer attractive residence-to-citizenship paths with strong mobility benefits.
12. What are capital controls and why do they matter?
Capital controls are government restrictions on moving money into or out of a country. They range from none (Singapore, Switzerland, US) to severe (China, India). They matter because restricted capital movement limits asset diversification, emergency fund access, and international business operations. Countries with no capital controls score highest (15/15); those with restrictions score proportionally lower.
13. How can offshore jurisdictions improve their rankings?
Traditional offshore centers could improve by: (1) Developing citizenship-by-investment programs with visa-free travel agreements (improving Passport Power), (2) Maintaining CRS compliance while strengthening legitimate privacy protections, (3) Expanding bilateral tax treaties, and (4) Ensuring banking infrastructure supports non-resident access. Some centers like Malta and Cyprus have successfully balanced offshore advantages with mainstream mobility.
14. Is this index suitable for everyone?
This index is designed for: (1) High-net-worth individuals seeking asset diversification, (2) International entrepreneurs needing cross-border business infrastructure, (3) Digital nomads requiring banking and company formation, and (4) Anyone considering second residence/citizenship. It's less relevant for those with primarily domestic financial lives or limited international business needs. Different components matter differently based on individual circumstances.
15. What makes this different from other passport or tax haven rankings?
Most rankings focus on single factors - just passport strength, or just tax rates, or just secrecy. This index combines practical factors that actually matter for international asset management: can you open a bank account? Can you travel? Can you form a company? Can you move money? We weight each factor by real-world importance based on what high-net-worth clients actually need for legitimate international planning.
Offshore Protection logo
  • Offshore Protection crafts tailored offshore strategies to help you internationalize your business, safeguard your assets, and gain the freedom to live life on your terms.

© 1996–2026. Offshore Protection. All Rights Reserved.

Site Maintained by Imagine Digital